special_revelation_is_a_violation_of_freewill
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| special_revelation_is_a_violation_of_freewill [2023/09/30 09:14] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | special_revelation_is_a_violation_of_freewill [2026/02/20 04:39] (current) – appledog | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| = Special Revelation is a violation of freewill | = Special Revelation is a violation of freewill | ||
| + | |||
| + | == pre | ||
| + | Spurious and False on its face! | ||
| + | |||
| + | Consider an article like https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | But, the christian who inevitably fails to do so then claims special revelation(!!) i.e. the necessity of the holy spirit to understand the text. This is a kind of bait and switch -- They take on the appellation of science, logic and intelligence when it suits them, and when it doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | What is most telling is that in every such situation the christian is themself unable to articulate the reading they say was given by the holy spirit. It is literally a cope to allow doublespeak, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let us take a closer look: | ||
| == As stated, | == As stated, | ||
| Line 7: | Line 18: | ||
| Andricus then said, ' | Andricus then said, ' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Meaning, we don't need the bible because by default the bible itself disagrees with our pre-existing belief. This in and of itself is neither good nor bad but it causes issues; ex. see [[Jeremiah vs. King David]]. | ||
| == What is ' | == What is ' | ||
special_revelation_is_a_violation_of_freewill.1696065286.txt.gz · Last modified: by 127.0.0.1
